Finishing up Richard Blayke's will, I do not see any mention of a son in this will, he does mention a daughter, his wife and his mother. Although I did sort of stick with the thought from a couple of years ago that this was the husband of Jone Blake (widow) who left her will in 1527 at Enham I think having gone through this will very thoroughly that Richard was not her husband. There are a few thoughts on just who may have been her husband. A William Blake and an Andrew Blake are mentioned in Robert's will although he does not mention any kinship and he did mention that Thomas and Richard were his sons. But he does leave everything moveable and immoveable to a Robert Blake. There are a couple of Robert Blake living in Enham at this time - a son of Thomas is Robert and a son of Jone Blake is Robert. Both Robert and Richard have mentioned a Robert Blake in their will. Robert was the first person on the indenture for the land. Could this be the husband of Jone Blake (widow) probably not living at the time of the writing of Robert's will but the Robert Blake mentioned in the will could be his son? The eldest son of Jone Blake is Robert Blake. Richard asks that his wife have a lifetime interest and occupation in the dwelling they occupied. Enham has several farms in this time frame as far as I can tell. A Subsidy might help me with this and is perhaps the place I should next pay attention to.
Jone's will is next I think although I am also debating doing Thomas next. I will think about it for a bit.
Nearly time for Church. A busy service and the chorister filled the Church with music and it was lovely. I must have been sleepy as I feel asleep during the sermon - I am getting old for sure. The hymns were lovely. It is time with Edward as he is buried in the Columbarium at the Church. Will I ever go back to Church; I do not think so. I find Church online to be beautiful.
Another beautiful day on God's earth; my personal diary really although I am always somewhat surprised to see people reading it and I do not mind. I have done a lot of transcription for the Blake Study which people use. The problem with my mind putting down on paper my thoughts which sometimes perhaps should not reach past my thoughts. I apologize for any thoughts that people find difficult as I think I am just 81 now and the thoughts spill out on occasion.
I believe it will be the will of Thomas next and I shall check and see if I have a will for William Blake or Andrew Blake out of curiosity or another Robert (although I do not think so). I have probably though still about five hundred Blake wills to transcribe.
Woke up in the night and as usual wanted to empty my brain of some of my thoughts. I did review Thomas' will but it did not add anything to my thoughts above other than it was a short will in 1541 which doesn't add anything significant except perhaps the reference to property called Rawkyns which his father (Robert 1521 will dated) passed to him and he passed it on to his son John and does mention his son Robert who was executor of the will and his daughter Margaret. He does not mention any other family member.
An interesting chart held by the Bridgwater Museum for the Blake family refers to the Andover Blake family:
This chart was produced much later (mid 1800s perhaps) than the Pedigree Chart (late 1600s into the 1700s) that was created by the College of Arms using documents from the descendants of Daniel Blake of London which also appears to have a discrepancy but solved more readily by the will of William Blake at Eastontown in 1582. This chart produced later has always perked my interest but none of it can be readily proven by wills. The reference to Boswell is particularly interesting. But it has picked up some of the thoughts of the Pedigree Chart mentioned above but moved the linkage with the main chart (must put that into my thinking tomorrow) back several generations from the linkage as shown in the Pedigree Chart as the will of William Blake 1582 definitely proved that Pedigree Chart to be inaccurate. I always knew at some point I would have all of these charts in front of me as I attempt to create a chart that utilizes all of the wills produced by this family in the 1500s and me trying to put it all together remembering the thoughts of my grandfather with regard to Nicholas. Amazing really to be in this position. What I really need is to have all the subsidies in front of me and must consider how to acquire those for this study. I can move on just another couple of generations or less and feel on very concrete ground with the records that exist and are in my collection. But I will struggle a bit with these early records to see what I can come up with for a beginning of the genealogical table.
The Blake family is certainly an interesting one at Andover and tomorrow I must again review The Hampshire Lay Subsidy Rolls 1586 produced by the Hampshire County Council in 1981 which I managed to acquire on one of our trips to Andover, Hampshire, England. There are a number of Blake families likely related in the Andover area. There is the red herring thrown in to all of this by the Emigrants Database 1330-1550 which I mentioned a day or so ago and has a Richard Blake arriving at Salisbury, Dorset in the 1400s. That along with my brother's yDNA match with someone from Dublin in 2008 has proven to be a most interesting detail. And of course his surname was also Blake!
Back to sleep as the mind is now empty once again prepared for another day and it is Labour Day in Canada and also cleaning day and I will do the top floor.
Thank you God for all that you do for the world. I was always glad that Edward and I started our travels to the British Isles and Europe in 2008 because his appetite to travel back and forth to Europe grew by leaps and bounds over the next decade and he got to see everything he ever really wanted to see except for the trips to Germany and The Netherlands which were pretty much cancelled by COVID. It was truly amazing how much we did see and I remain amazed at the distances in Europe/British Isles compared to the northern Western Hemisphere which is so much larger and greater distances. One can understand why the overflow from Europe in the 1500s on led to so much immigration by northern European/British Isles to the Western Hemisphere. The explosion of people coming north now from the African Continent is an expression perhaps of the land becoming less usable and the people too many to be supported by it. But the people per square kilometre in Europe is so much greater than the same here in North America. But Canada is less appealing because of the northern weather which of course has always kept the Scandinavian Peninsula much less populated than Europe itself and the British Isles.
Enough thinking of the night and back to bed. Goodnight world.