Today will be principally a research day. Just a few hits now left in the search at Find My past looking at results for "Pencombe" all variations between births from 1480 to 1560. It did pull out a lot of information but seemed to miss some items so will do searches on the lines pulled out now. Some agreement with the Charts here and there. I will do some searches in existing trees to see what emerges. My own tree has not actually been up on the system that long so should not see a strong effect there but we will see. The real question is can this be done with so much information destroyed in the bombing of the Exeter Registery Office in 1942. A lot of the land records fortunately are still available which is the basis often enough of the sort in the 1500s. The 1600s have a different problem with the Cromwell period and a change from the Church maintaining the records to the municipal level. I am seeing somewhat less of that being a factor as compared to the Hampshire records at that time though I must admit. Further from London perhaps so the rules were not quite so strictly maintained, a thought anyway.
Having the proof back to John Pincombe and Mary Charly is handy. Plus the transcription of John's will by Dr Richard Pinkham prior to the wills being destroyed also very lucky. Being able to clearly prove that the parents of this John were John Pincombe and Grace Manning would be a plus. Not having contributors to the Bishops Nympton page is a drawback perhaps but the land records may still solve that problem. Interesting that John mentions a property in North Molton but the distance between all of these places in North Devon is quite small. According to the AI the straight line distance is four to five miles. We traveled this road in 2008 from North Molton to Bishops Nympton.
I do plan on getting back to Blake today and will begin with what I know about the Blake families at Enham and review that first and second generation information in the Legacy file. The wills are abundant in this family at that time and very helpful. I postulated that Robert (left his will in 1521) had a third son deceased who was married to Joane Blake widow at Enham who also left a will naming her three children Robert, Nicholas and Elizabeth. That would have given the Robert (will 1521) three sons namely unknown, Richard and Thomas. Sometimes the simplest method is the logical path and Joane was definitely married to a Blake and all of them are at Enham in this time frame. Robert's sons Richard and Thomas both left wills to help in this as well Joane's sons Robert and Nicholas also fortuitously left wills to aid this process. I shall review them today and make sure I have gleaned everything possible from the wills.
Middle of the night and I woke up so decided to look a bit at my day ahead. Back to sleep.
Morning, how nice and probably about seven hours sleep. Plenty of sleep but broken up by a 2.5 hour period of awake. My mind is restless and it shows. I have lived with that all of my days as long as I can remember. As a child I used to wake up and wander the house and discovered that my father did the same thing. Anyway tonight I will sleep better I always say to myself and we will see. At least I get enough sleep.
Thinking of John Pincombe and Mary Charly and whether I can prove that John Pincombe and Grace Manning were John's parents. One possible clue is the naming of their daughters Mary the eldest daughter and Grace the younger daughter. It seems easy but how common was the name Grace; that is my curiosity. My mother was convinced that John Pincombe and Grace Manning were the names of this John's parents. What do I know about them. John Pincombe was born and baptized 12 Jul 1692 at Bishops Nympton and he was married to Grace Manning 20 Mar 1725 at Bishops Nympton. Grace was baptized 20 Junm 1693 at Bishops Nympton and buried 27 Jul 1765 at Bishops Nympton. The eldest child of John and Grace Pincombe was William and he married Grace Smyth at North Molton 13 Jun 1758. Their only child was also William baptized 31 May 1759 at Bishops Nympton. Unfortunately this William was buried 26 Dec 1780 at Bishops Nympton. His father William Pincombe was buried 7 Dec 1783 at Bishops Nympton and Grace his wife was buried 3 Apr 1783 at Bishops Nympton. At that point in time 26 Dec 1780 when the son William died John would have inherited any property in that family.
John married Mary Charly 8 Nov 1767 at Bishops Nympton when he was 39 years of age; his older brother John had married at 31 years of age.
William and John also had a sister Grace who married John Butcher 31 Mar 1755 at Bishops Nympton and she was 23 years of age. She died five months after her infant son 16 Jun 1763 leaving behind two daughters (Mary her second daughter died as a young child). Her daughters were named Grace, Mary and Mary. So a true alignment of naming for sure and one is certainly tempted to think that my mother was correct with remembering the names of John Pincombe's parents.
Since John and Mary (Charly) Pincombe named their daughter Grace before their sister in law Grace passed away but after John's mother passed away it does seem reasonable that his mother was named Grace. But I will keep tentative in my mind although it does seem very significant this naming.
At this point in the trace back I was thinking of what my cousin had said after she talked to an individual at the College of Arms who said (and I agree having transcribed the parish registers of Bishops Nympton) that the Pincombe families at Bishops Nympton were principally descendant of John Pincombe and Jane/Johane Blackmoore who had married 25 Sep 1655 at Bishops Nympton. In total they had six children - William, Johan, Wilmote, John, Thomas, Hugh. All survived to adulthood with the exception of John who died at 13 years of age. The naming of the daughters interesting (they were twins actually) Johan and Wilmote. I spent quite a while sorting out the descendants of these children. In between John married to Johan Blackmoore and John married to Grace Manning was a period of 70 years. I examined all the Pincombe marriages in this time period and the best fit I felt was William Pincombe married to Mary Vicary. This William had inherited the titles to the property as the eldest and it does show in the records. Again it does not agree with the chart that Galen Pinkham and Dr Richard Pinkham produced. But it was partly choosing John Pincombe of Knowstone that was the difference. I could not find anything about a John PIncombe of Knowstone and that continues to this day. When I pick this up again I will be working from Richard Pincombe married to Anne (unknown) and Frances Gill and their children as part of that fourth and fifth generation. That will be when I have purchased the document that I have asked to be paged.
My plan today is to work on Blake although I will complete the ten hits in the search that I still have to do just to leave that a completed search. But I wanted to relate into my blog why I did not agree with the chart for my line at Bishops Nympton.